I realize it's almost sacrilegious to profess an apathy towards Shakespeare, but he's just never done it for me; it could just be my complete ignorance, or incompetence for that matter. This particular production, however, was the most stimulating play of which I've ever attended. The opening scene, where all of the men are biting their thumbs and such, was so intense and quite abrupt. There were pyrotechnics involved and lots of slashing around with swords. It was...intense, for lack of a better word. I was almost certain the play would take place in the traditional, sixteenth-century context, seeing as the characters were outfitted with traditional dress, but as several other characters ran on stage wielding active fire extinguishers I knew I was in for something different. Moreover, Romeo and Juliet wore complete modern clothing as well--Romeo, a hoodie and Juliet, some skinny jeans and a blouse. Their families and friends, however, remained in traditional attire.
My favorite part, probably because it resembled so closely the dance sequence in A Knight's Tale, was the scene wherein Romeo meets Juliet at the ball. The scene took on an almost tribal-like dance appearance. Most of the cast ran around in a spastic cyclone while Juliet belly danced in the middle...crazy.
The end of the play was surprising as well. As Romeo and Juliet lay dead, both of their families and several police officers appear on stage, all dressed in modern clothing, as if all of this was some alternate fantasy dreamed by two flippant teens. To me, the end suggested that this tragedy, and Shakespeare himself, is just as relevant to contemporary society as it was four hundred years ago. The familiar story of impassioned love, familial strife, vengeance, obsession, sacrifice, etc. remains applicable to our chaotic modern age, and it is Shakespeare who still manages to suspend our preoccupations with another one of his classic tales. It's hard for me, as I'm sure it is for many, to perceive the immense influence Shakespeare has had on the collective of literature, films, story-telling, etc. The basis of his plays and poems have historically become ingrained in post-sixteenth century societies to the point where current artists unconsciously draw from the same themes and subject matter. I suppose this is a perfect example of the intertexuality we see studied so often in literature, it still amazes me!
Hey Michael! I just got home from school which is depressing so I thought I would read about you're awesome life. Great write up on the theater. I guess I need to read more. I'm ashamed to admit I did not know what "precipitous" meant. Luckily I could use your sick context clues to help me out haha. I'm reading Shakespeare's Twelfth Night in my brit lit class and I guess he's not my cup of tea either. Nothing I have read thus far in Brit Lit has caught my attention...sucks. Is that what you study over there? I wish you could take American Lit over there and see what they teach...you should ask someone haha. Great post.
ReplyDeleteTori,I'm actually taking several American Literature classes over here. My last session of my "Reading the American Man" class involved a whole discussion on the British perception of America and masculinity. Ashamedly, I didn't participate at all because I was too scared to compete with the eloquence of the Brits. I didn't really have an opinion on anything they were saying, which made me even more ashamed since the discussion regarded America.
ReplyDeleteAre you taking any other lit. classes besides Brit. Lit.?
When you speak, people listen. So speak Michael because you have wonderful things to say. You will never have another chance like this. I miss you guys too much. Everyday when im walking the streets of Atlanta I imagine where you kids are and well its depressing haha. Lets skype some time I have a billion questions and I dont think Hillary likes answering them lol.
ReplyDeleteNo more lit classes for me...probably ever which I can hardly stand...next semester I start my major classes...all rhetoric.